AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Github actions black formatter11/2/2023 When using a repo scoped Personal Access Token instead of GITHUB_TOKEN, the push triggers all pull request checks to run again.If modified files exist they are committed and pushed to the remote.The workflow checks to see if any tracked files by git have been modified. Check out the docs for further description of the formatter and its options.The code formatter executes and modifies files if necessary.When a pull request is raised the workflow executes as a check.Using a repo scoped Personal Access Token is an approved workaround. This is to prevent accidental “infinite loop” situations, and as an anti-abuse measure. This is due to a deliberate limitation imposed by GitHub Actions that events raised by a workflow (such as push) cannot trigger further workflow runs. Important caveat 2: If you have other pull request checks besides the following workflow then you must use a Personal Access Token instead of the default GITHUB_TOKEN. Private repositories can be configured to enable workflows from forks to run without restriction. Important caveat 1: Due to token restrictions on public repository forks these workflows do not work for pull requests raised from forks. Ruff is extremely actively developed and used in major open-source projects like: Apache Airflow. Lets dive in GitHub Actions is a feature of GitHub that. The following example uses the autopep8 action to format Python code. Ruff can be used to replace Flake8 (plus dozens of plugins), isort, pydocstyle, yesqa, eradicate, pyupgrade, and autoflake, all while executing tens or hundreds of times faster than any individual tool. This post is an intro to GitHub Actions which features setup for black formatter for Python. With a lot of trial and error, I discovered this is possible using an on: pull_request workflow in GitHub Actions. Automated code formatting of pull request branches Wouldn’t it be great to have automated code formatting of pull request branches. Failing to format before raising pull requests often means that checks will fail and corrections will need to be made. Since they run client-side they all rely on engineers setting these tools up correctly. The most common way to use these is client-side, either using git-hooks to format on pre-commit, or text editor plugins that format on save. Many programming languages have auto-formatting tools. Black calls itself the uncompromising code formatter and its entire purpose is to remove discussions of style from the debate. See slash-command-dispatch for such a solution. GitHub stars formatter GitHub release (latest SemVer) GitHub last commit GitHub commit activity GitHub. Update: While the approach outlined in this post does work, my current recommendation would be to use a slash command style “ChatOps” solution for operations on pull requests.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |